Trump says he'll decide whether to broadcast military execution

Courtney McBride, Bloomberg News on Oct 10, 2026

By clicking submit, I authorize Arcamax and its affiliates to: (1) use, sell, and share my information for marketing purposes, including cross-context behavioral advertising, as described in our Privacy Policy , (2) add to information that I provide with other information like interests inferred from web page views, or data lawfully obtained from data brokers, such as past purchase or location data, or publicly available data, (3) contact me or enable others to contact me by email or other means with offers for different types of goods and services, and (4) retain my information while I am engaging with marketing messages that I receive and for a reasonable amount of time thereafter. I understand I can opt out at any time through an email that I receive, or by clicking here

President Donald Trump said he will make a decision on whether to go ahead with plans to livestream the execution of a former Army major who killed 13 people in 2009, amid bipartisan criticism of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s idea.

“By showing it, maybe other people won’t be doing what he did,” Trump told reporters Saturday as he left the White House to participate in a political rally in Tennessee. “So I’ll make a decision ultimately. I know what the military would like to do, but we’ll make a decision.”

Asked Friday about the plan to broadcast the execution of former Army psychologist Nidal Hasan, he had said the administration would make a determination on whether to proceed with a public livestream.

“But he will be killed. He will be through firing squad,” Trump added. “I really don’t care how he goes, as long as he goes, and I think that the death penalty is a very worthy way of going for him.”

Hegseth on Thursday made a surprise announcement that the execution would be broadcast publicly. Republicans and Democrats alike — including some supporters of Trump — have said livestreaming the execution violates American values and could fuel terrorist recruitment. Senator John Curtis, a Utah Republican, urged Hegseth to reconsider.

“I absolutely support the sentence of death, but live-streaming executions is what jihadists do,” Rep. Austin Scott, a Georgia Republican who has been critical of Hegseth in the past, said in a post on social media. “America is better than that.”

Earlier Friday, Vice President JD Vance had also cast doubt on whether the execution would be livestreamed and said he would not watch if it was.

“I don’t know that that’s actually going to happen,” Vance said when asked how Hegseth’s plan squared with his Christian faith. “Look, if it’s all through livestream, I’m not going to be watching it.”

The vice president, who wrote a book this year about his conversion to Catholicism, made clear he believed that Hasan should be executed.

Archbishop Paul Coakley, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, issued a statement condemning the plan for a public execution as “a barbaric promotion of a culture of death.” The Catholic Church opposes capital punishment.

Hasan opened fire at the Fort Hood Soldier Readiness Center in Killeen, Texas, in November 2009, killing 13 and wounding 32 before he was subdued. He was sentenced by a military court to death, and he’s set to be executed by firing squad on Dec. 3.

Hegseth announced the plan during an interview with Real America’s Voice on Thursday. The idea touched off a wave of condemnation from Democrats, who renewed calls for his removal and have voiced plans to try to impeach him if they gain control of the House of Representatives in November.

Public executions haven’t been carried out in the U.S. for decades, and Army regulations limit the witnesses who can attend — including barring anyone younger than 18. There is no formal provision for livestreaming the punishment.

Hegseth’s decision had its supporters. Rep. Andy Ogles, a Tennessee Republican, said in a social media post that public execution “is what this terrorist deserves. We will be watching.”

Katie Miller, who served in the first Trump administration and is married to senior aide Stephen Miller, invoked the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk in backing the decision. “Charlie Kirk was murdered for all to see,” Miller said in a post on X. “We should all see accountability when it finally comes.”

Conservative commentator Erick Erickson suggested the administration would actually be undermining its own cause, including efforts to advance Christianity. He focused in part on the fact that Hasan was paralyzed from the waist down in the aftermath of the shooting and remains confined to a wheelchair.

“If the Pentagon does go forward with this, it is actually soul-twisting to turn the execution of a criminal into reality television for the entertainment of Americans,” Erickson wrote on his Substack.

Retired Lt. Gen. Sean MacFarland, who approved Hasan’s death sentence when he commanded Fort Hood in 2013, criticized the idea of broadcasting the execution as “more of an act of vengeance than an act of justice.”

MacFarland, who awarded Purple Hearts to victims and their survivors, said in an interview that a public death risks turning Hasan into a martyr for extremists — and grants him one final platform to spread his views.

“If we’re going to record this live, it’s customary to give the person sentenced to death an opportunity to make a final statement,” MacFarland said. “What’s he going to say?”

———

(With assistance from Jennifer A. Dlouhy, Catherine Lucey and Romy Varghese.)